Legal Opinion

Richard Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru of New England

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided March 31, 1998No. 3:91cv378 (JBA)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

ARTERTON, District Judge.

This diversity case, tried to the bench, requires determination of whether the circumstances surrounding the defendant’s termination and non-renewah of the parties’ Dealership Agreement was for good cause and done in good faith under the Connecticut Motor Dealer’s Act, Conn. Gen.Stat. § 42-133v. The termination, commenced by defendant’s Notice issued June 26, 1991 and effective September 30, 1991, was precipitated by plaintiffs relocation of its Subaru franchise to a different location and facility than that specified in the Agreement,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Habetz v. CondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Petereit v. S.B. Thomas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  3. Brattleboro Auto Sales, Inc. v. Subaru of New England, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. ESPN, Inc. v. Office of the Commissioner of BaseballDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
  2. Chic Miller's Chevrolet, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
  3. Rohrich Cadillac, Inc. v. Bureau of Professional & Occupational AffairsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Perry v. County of KernDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. San Francisco Baykeeper v. United States Fish And Wildlife ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API