Legal Opinion
San Francisco Baykeeper v. United States Fish And Wildlife Service
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 5, 2024No. 3:23-cv-06601Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division 11 SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER, Case No. 23-cv-06601-LB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY 13 v. JUDGMENT IN PART 14 UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE Re: ECF No. 11 SERVICE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 INTRODUCTION 18 This case concerns the proposed listing of the longfin smelt DPS as an endangered species by 19 the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Plaintiff San Francisco Baykeeper, an advocacy organization, 20 sued the federal defendants because the Service did not…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Russell E. Train, in His Official Capacity as Administrator, Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- National Wildlife Federation v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Riverbend Farms, Inc. v. MadiganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Sierra Club v. CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1987
- Richard Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru of New EnglandDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1998