United States v. Chisholm
Army Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CARTER, Judge:
A general court-martial composed of officer members convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of conspiracy to commit rape, conspiracy to obstruct justice, making a false official statement, and rape, in violation of Articles 81, 107, and 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 881, 907, and 920 [hereinafter UCMJ]. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for four years, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to Private E1. The case is before the court for review under Article…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. TardifCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
- Weiss v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. WeissUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
- United States v. CollazoArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. ChisholmCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
- United States v. GarmanArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
- United States v. Van VlietUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2006