Legal Opinion

United States v. Chisholm

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided November 18, 2003No. 03-5003/ARPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

At a general court-martial composed of officer members, Appellee was convicted, contrary to his pleas, of conspiracy to commit rape, conspiracy to obstruct justice, making a false official statement, and rape, in violation of Articles 81, 107 and 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. §§ 881, 907 and 920 (2000), respectively. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for four years, total forfeitures, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The convening authority approved these results. Before the Army Court of Criminal Appeals, he requested a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. ClayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  2. United States v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  3. United States v. ChisholmArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. LRM v. KastenbergCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
  2. United States v. WuterichCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
  3. United States v. GarmanArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
  4. United States v. Al BahlulUnited States Court of Military Commission Review · 2011
  5. United States v. NealNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API