Legal Opinion
Newhall v. Joseph Levy Bag Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 7, 1912No. Civ. No. 945PublishedCited by 12 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. George A. Sturtevant, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Thomas H. Breeze, Gordon Hall, and Albert Fink, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Plaintiffs allege in their complaint that on August 3, 1908, defendant “made, executed and entered into a certain contract in writing with said plaintiffs, which said contract was in words and figures as follows:
“ ‘BAG CONTRACT.
“ ‘August 3/08.
“ ‘For and in consideration of one dollar in hand paid, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, we hereby purchase from H. M. Newhall & Co. one thousand (1000) bales (each bale 1000 bags) 36x22-12 oz. Standard Calcutta grain bags: To be delivered in good order and condition at San Francisco, California, ex steamer and/or ship and/or warehouse at…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gordon v. PrestonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1833
- Crowley v. Genesee Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
- Gribble v. Columbus Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Phillips v. Sanger Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Bank of Pennsylvania v. ReedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sessions v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
- Whitcomb v. OllerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Leitch v. MarxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Higson v. Montgomery Ward & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Crookum v. KetchumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.