Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Mitten

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 2, 1934No. 13,553PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler

This is a proceeding under the Declaratory Judgments Act. The petitioners sought to have an initiated measure, adopted by the people and appearing in the Session Laws of 1933 as chapter 157, declared valid, and to have a legislative act, appearing in said Session Laws as chapter 156, declared void. Both acts relate to legislative reapportionment. The trial court upheld the contention of the petitioners.

Section 45 of article 5 of the state Constitution is as follows: “The general assembly shall provide by law for an enumeration of the inhabitants of the state, in the year of our Lord 1885, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Snowball v. PendegastCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Bradley v. Union Bridge & Construction Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1911

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Jones v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  3. Asbury Park Press, Inc. v. WoolleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  4. People v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  5. People Ex Rel. Salazar v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API