Legal Opinion
Ashkenazi v. Attorney General of the United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 24, 2003No. CIV.A.03-062 (GK)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KESSLER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Zalmen Ashkenazi, challenges his re-designation by the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) to a Federal Prison Camp rather than the Community Corrections Center (“CCC” or “halfway house”) to which he was originally designated. Plaintiff contends that the re-designation violates the Ex Post Facto Clause of the Constitution. On January 22, 2003, the Court appointed the Federal Public Defender for the District of Columbia as ami-cus curiae. Defendants are the Attorney General of the United States and the Director of the BOP..
This matter is now before…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Lynce v. MathisSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Warden v. MarreroSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- American Rivers v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Iacaboni v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- United States v. Samuel L. Eakman, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Monahan v. WinnDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- Colton v. AshcroftDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.