Legal Opinion
O'TOOle v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 10, 1953No. 10915_1PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Chief Judge.
The principal question presented by this appeal is which, if either, of the defendants may be charged with responsibility for the torts of the District of Columbia National Guard committed during peacetime training at a time when the District of Columbia National Guard had not been ordered to active service as a component of the United States Army.
The facts alleged in the amended complaint are as follows. On July 9, 1950, Charlotte M. O’Toole and Thomas B. O’Toole, her husband, were passengers in an automobile owned by Thomas B. O’Toole and being driven north on Route 14 in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Holly (Two Cases). United States v. SaundersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- United States v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- Gilroy v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Margaret E. Harris v. Donald S. Boreham. Margaret E. Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- Charles E. Chaudoin v. Clarence E. Atkinson, JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Clayton v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- John McShain, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- United States v. Grover AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.