Legal Opinion

Gilroy v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 4, 1953No. Civ. 2045-51PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLTZOFF, District Judge.

This is an action against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346, 2671 et seq. for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff as the result of a fall on a broken part of the curb on Constitution Avenue between 20th and 21st Streets, in the City of Washington.

The suit is brought against the United States rather than against the District of Columbia because Constitution Avenue is under the control of the United States through the National Park Service, and the duty- to keep the sidewalks -and the paving on that street in repair rests on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pessagno v. Euclid Inv. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. Blaine v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1951

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dorcas J. Daniels-Lumley v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
  2. O'TOOle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  3. Pennsylvania RR Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1954
  4. Anderson v. CornejoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
  5. Marva Cooks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API