Legal Opinion
United States v. Holly (Two Cases). United States v. Saunders
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 31, 1951No. 4262-4264PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PICKETT, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs brought these separate actions under the Federal Tort Claims Act 1 to recover damages for injuries sustained when an automobile driven by C. B. Holly was struck by a jeep owned by the United States and driven by Emil H. Maness, a member of the Oklahoma National Guard. The cases were consolidated for trial. At the time of the accident Maness was employed as a “unit caretaker” assigned to Company F of the 279th Infantry, 45th Division, Oklahoma National Guard. The court found that the injuries to the plaintiffs were caused by the negligence of Maness in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. RahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Jones v. GoodsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- United States v. Wholesale Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
- Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
3Cited by32 opinions
- Maryland Ex Rel. Levin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Margaret E. Harris v. Donald S. Boreham. Margaret E. Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- Charles E. Chaudoin v. Clarence E. Atkinson, JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- John W. Pattno, Administrator of the Estate of Gene A. Lewis, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- O'TOOle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.