Legal Opinion
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Specia
Texas Supreme Court
Decided March 24, 1993No. D-2779PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HIGHTOWER, Justice.
In this original proceeding, Relator Aet-na Surety & Casualty Company (Aetna) seeks a writ of mandamus directing the trial judge to vacate his order excluding the testimony of certain fact and expert witnesses. We conditionally grant the writ of mandamus.
After a dispute arose between Aetna and Sanger & Altgelt Insurance Company (Sanger & Altgelt), Aetna sued Sanger & Alt-gelt alleging negligence, breach of fiduciary duty and breach of the duty of loyalty. On November 26, 1990, approximately two weeks before trial, Sanger & Altgelt filed a motion to exclude the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Alvarado v. Farah Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
- Bodnow Corp. v. City of HondoTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Greenberg v. BrookshireTexas Supreme Court · 1982
- Bryson v. SullivanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- In Re Team Rocket, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- Norris v. Hearst TrustCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- In Re BennettTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Villafani v. TrejoTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- Cotten v. Weatherford Bancshares, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2006
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.