Cvitanovich-Dubie v. Dubie
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by
ACOBA, J.
I believe that jurisdiction over the divorce complaint filed by Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant Geraldine Cvitanovich-Dubie (Geraldine) existed in the family court of the first circuit (the court or the family court) for the reasons stated herein, but I respectfully dissent to the majority’s holding that Geraldine’s Hawaii Family Court Rules (HFCR) Rule 60(b) (2010) claims sounding in fraud on the court and undue influence are barred under HFCR Rule 60(b)(3) because she failed to bring them within one year from the entry of judgment. In my view, her…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. MayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Anne Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc., Anne Anderson v. Beatrice Foods Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Elizabeth Albright Latshaw v. Trainer Wortham & Company, Inc., a Corporation Robert J. Vile, a Natural PersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.