Legal Opinion

McElya v. Hill

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1900PublishedCited by 24 opinions

FROM CARROLL. Appeal from Chancery Court of Carroll County. A. G. Hawkiks, Oh.

1Opinion of the Court

McAlister J.

This bill was filed for the rescission of a sale of land.

On the 8th of July, 1896, J'no. 0. Hill and wife executed a deed to the complainant, Mrs. M, 0. McElya, for a house and lot in Huntingdon at the price of $1,500. Complainant paid $800 in cash, and for the balance of purchase money executed two notes, each for the sum of $350, payable in one and two years respectively. The first note was credited by the sum of $130, the value of a horse and wagon which defendants accepted in part payment of the note. Shortly after the purchase complainant went into possession of the property.

O…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Land Co. v. HillTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Scruggs v. HeiskellTennessee Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Dale v. Thomas H. Temple Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Davis v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1943
  3. Dixon v. MorganTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Third Nat. Bank v. American Equitable Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1943
  5. De Rossett Hat Co. v. London Lancashire Fire Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API