Legal Opinion

Kam v. City & County of Honolulu

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1947No. 2626Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

KEMP, C. J.

The plaintiff-appellee, hereafter referred to as plaintiff, commenced this action of general assumpsit against the defendant-appellant, hereinafter referred to as defendant, in the circuit court of the first judicial circuit, Territory of Hawaii. The substance of plaintiff’s amended complaint filed May 18, 1945, is that heretofore, on or about the 26th day of March, 1943, the defendant was justly and truly indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $6509.80, for work, labor and services before that time performed by the plaintiff for the defendant at its special…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. McCarthy v. . Mayor, Etc., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. United States v. PostSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Armstrong v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Potter v. Borough of MetuchenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API