Legal Opinion
Schickling v. Aspinall
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided June 10, 1988No. Record 850466PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPoff, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment denying both the claim and the counterclaim in a breach-of-contract action. By assignment of error, the appellant-defendants question the trial court’s construction of the contract, and the appellee-plaintiff assigns cross-error to the trial court’s ruling against his damage claim.
In November 1981, Robert Schickling and his wife, Dorothy, entered into a “CO-OWNERSHIP AGREEMENT” with Kenneth J. Aspinall to acquire a house and lot from a third party. The document identified the Schicklings as “Resident” and Aspinall as “Non Resident”. The Schicklings were…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gullett Gin Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Railroad Co. v. KoontzSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Burks v. Webb, AdministratrixSupreme Court of Virginia · 1957
- Hall v. MillerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
- Johnson v. KellamSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Acuar v. LetourneauSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
- Wills v. FosterIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
- Hardi v. MezzanotteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Mitchell v. HaldarSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Lopez v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.