State v. Silva
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.
In this case, we are asked to decide whether article I, section 22 of the Washington State Constitution affords a pro se pretrial detainee a greater right of access to the courts than the federal constitution provides. We hold that it does, but that Silva was provided that access. We also clarify the role standby counsel plays in assisting a pro se defendant.
I
Matthew Silva was charged with taking a car without permission and attempting to elude the police. He was held on $10,000 bond and remained in prison during the pendency of his trial. Under CrR 3.3, he was entitled to a trial within 60…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
- State v. RafayWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. VincentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- Harris v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Harris v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.