Legal Opinion
State Bank of Brooten v. American National Bank of Little Falls
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 14, 1978No. 47683PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying defendant’s motion for a new trial in an action brought by State Bank of Brooten (State Bank) against American National Bank of Little Falls (American) to determine American’s liability on a bank money order issued by American to State Bank, the payee. We reverse.
In 1974, Steve Radloff purchased an irrigation system from Bonanza Valley Sales and Irrigation, Inc. (Bonanza). Radloff promised to pay the sales price of approximately $100,000 upon delivery. After the system was installed and part payment had been made,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tpo Incorporated v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of Eatontown National BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Leininger v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Dakota Transfer & Storage Co. v. Merchants National Bank & Trust Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
- Thompson Poultry, Inc. v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
- Wilson Supply Co. v. West Artesia Transmission Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Zelenka v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Santos v. First Nat'l State Bk. of NJNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- Rezapolvi v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Able & Associates, Inc. v. Orchard Hill FarmsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Farmers & Merchants State Bank, an Idaho Banking Corporation v. Western Bank, an Oregon Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.