Legal Opinion

Thompson Poultry, Inc. v. First National Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1977No. 41070PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.

This is an action on a “Bank Money Order” drawn on the defendant bank and payable to the plain tiff. The money order was purchased by S & H Poultry Inc., on February 9, 1973, and delivered to the plaintiff in payment for a load of poultry products. After S & H had received the poultry from the plaintiff it decided to go out of business and returned the poultry to the plaintiff later that same day. When the defendant refused to honor the money order this action was commenced.

The trial court found generally in favor of the defendant and dismissed the action. The plaintiff has appealed.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tpo Incorporated v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of Eatontown National BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  2. First National Bank of Mineola v. Farmers & Merchants State Bank of AthensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hecker v. Ravenna BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Santos v. First Nat'l State Bk. of NJNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  3. Rezapolvi v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  4. State Bank of Brooten v. American National Bank of Little FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. First National Bank v. Duncan Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API