Blaul v. W. M. Tharp & Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Vcm Burén District Court. — Hon. H. C.. Traverse, Judge, Action aided by attachment to recover a balance-alleged to be due on account for merchandise sold. The defendants denied indebtedness, and pleaded a. counterclaim for the alleged wrongful suing out of the-attachment. There was a trial by jury, and a verdict and judgment in favor of the defendants. The plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
1. action on account stated: zevasive answre Ivideie^m!o7mT°ns I. The petition alleges that the-defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of' two hundred and ninety-three dollars and eighty-eight cents, upon an account for • merchandise sold and delivered by the plaintiffs to the defendants between the first day of January, 1885, and the fifth day of August, 1888. A statement of account is attached to and made a part of the petition, which shows a balance due the plaintiffs on the eleventh day of June, 1888, of sixty-three dollars and forty-three cents, and numerous articles of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kimball v. Union Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1872
- Meshke v. Van DorenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
- State v. LyonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860
- Robinson v. KeithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- Fleming v. BaileyMississippi Supreme Court · 1870
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ford v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Marshall v. Estate of ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Sigler v. MurphySupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Gutschenritter v. WhitmoreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Ruthven v. Beckwith & De GroatSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890