State v. Jacobs
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BERNSTEIN, Chief Justice.
This is in answer to a question in a criminal case certified to this Court by the Superior Court of Maricopa County. Defendant was convicted of forgery. Motion for a new trial has been argued and taken under advisement. The defendant has not been sentenced.
The question is before this Court pursuant to Rule 346, Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S., which reads in applicable part:
“If * * * after verdict or finding of guilty but before sentence, any question of law arises which in the opinion of the trial court is so important and doubtful as to require the decision…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BloseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- United States v. AmorosaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- State v. KellingtonArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Hatchet v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
3Cited by32 opinions
- State v. KellyArizona Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. GallagherArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. MooreArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- State v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.