Legal Opinion

State v. Dixon

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 25, 2006No. 2 CA-CR 2006, 2 CA-CR 2016-2PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RICHMOND, Judge.

This is a consolidated appeal from two separate convictions, and the sentences imposed. In 2 CA-CR 2006 appellant challenges his conviction of unlawful sale of a narcotic drug with two prior felony convictions. He bases his appeal on four allegations of error: 1) the denial of a 12-person jury; 2) failure to preclude his impeachment by prior felony convictions; 3) enhanced sentencing based on insufficient proof of a prior felony conviction; 4) denial of his right to allocution prior to sentence pronouncement.

In 2 CA-CR 2016 appellant attacks his conviction of theft with…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Barnes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. GaineySupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. United States v. Paul v. OatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  5. Yee Hem v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Pool v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. PolandArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. GilliesArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. EncinasArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  5. James v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API