State v. Petrucci
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
SKILLMAN, P.J.A.D.
This appeal is before us for the second time. In our first opinion, we held that the definition of “assault firearm” in the assault firearms statute, which requires imposition of a ten-year parole ineligibility period upon a defendant convicted of possession of an “assault firearm with the intent to use it against the person of another[,]” N.J.S.A. 2C:43-6g, is not unconstitutionally vague. State v. Petrucci, 343 N.J.Super. 536, 544-47, 779 A.2d 429 (App.Div.2001). In addition, we concluded that defendant’s own account of the offense…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- State v. StantonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- State v. NataleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- State v. NataleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.