Legal Opinion

State v. Natale

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 20, 2003PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Conley’s opinion in the Appellate Division, reported at 348 N.J.Super. 625, 792 A.2d 565 (2002). We add only these brief comments.

On remand, the State may elect not to proceed to a trial on a NERA predicate in which case the trial court must resentence defendant without application of NERA. In the event that the State seeks to have the court impose a NERA sentence, the court shall try the NERA issue to a jury and the jury shall determine, applying the beyond-a-reasonable-doubt standard, whether defendant attempted to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. NataleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. NataleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  2. State v. JohnsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  3. State v. NataleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
  4. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  5. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API