Legal Opinion

Rowland v. Carriers Insurance Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1987PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

This Workers’ Compensation appeal involves the issue of whether Plaintiff, James A. Rowland, is barred from recovering benefits from Defendants, Carriers Insurance Company and Producers Transport Company, because of material misrepresentations about his physical condition on his application for employment. The law on this issue is firmly established and the determinative question on appeal is simply whether any material evidence supports the decision of the trial court. 1 The trial court found that Plaintiff had wilfully and knowingly made false representations of his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alley v. Consolidation Coal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. TaylorTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Quaker Oats Co. v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Beasley v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Renee Purtle v. Eldridge Auto Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. Peerless Wall & Window Coverings, Inc. v. Synchronics, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Ex Parte Southern Energy Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Sanchez v. Memorial General HospitalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API