Legal Opinion
United States v. Thomas
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 24, 2011No. Crim. 01-410-01 (TFH)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion
THOMAS F. HOGAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are Mr. Thomas’s (i) Pro Se Motion to Correct Judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 36 [Dkt. # 83] (the “Motion to Correct ”), and (ii) Pro Se Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 [Dkt. # 79] (the “Habeas Motion ”). After a careful review of the motions, the oppositions thereto, and the record of this case, the Court DENIES both motions for the reasons stated herein.
I. Background
On July 24, 2001, D.C. police arrested Mr. Thomas after another person accused him assaulting him with a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Massaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. MitchellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- United States v. Andreas TambergDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- United States v. KellyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- WILLIAMS v. DIRECTOR VIRGIN ISLANDS BUREAU OF CORRECTIONSSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2024