Legal Opinion

United States v. Mitchell

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 30, 2012No. Criminal No. 2005-0110PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is petitioner Vernard Mitchell’s pro se Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Upon consideration of petitioner’s motion and reply, the opposition response, case record, applicable law, and for the reasons set forth below, Mr. Mitchell’s habeas motion is DENIED.

I. BACKGROUND

Three and a half weeks after his arrest in Northeast Washington, DC, Petitioner was indicted March 24, 2005 on weapons and drug charges. After pretrial motions and continuances by both sides, a five-day jury…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. MitchellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  2. United States v. ParkerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  3. United States v. AljaffDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  4. United States v. BowmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  5. United States v. HallDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API