Legal Opinion

Hunter-Reay v. Franchise Tax Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 16, 1983No. Civ. 66039PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EAGLESON, J. *

The primary issue on appeal is whether a trial court may

restrain and enjoin the sale of a taxpayer’s noncash asset seized pursuant to a jeopardy assessment pending the trial of a civil petition for refund. We hold that a sale may not be so enjoined.

Facts

This is an appeal from the granting of a preliminary injunction by which the superior court restrained the appellant from selling or otherwise disposing of a 1972 Ferrari and a 1967—1968 Golden Eagle Cessna aircraft owned by respondent, pending trial.

Respondent is plaintiff below. On September 18, 1979, the Franchise Tax…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Modern Barber Colleges, Inc. v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Aronoff v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Dupuy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Helms Bakeries v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Franchise Tax Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Franchise Tax Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. People Ex Rel. Franchise Tax Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API