Bohlen v. Richardson
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD R. BECKER, District Judge.
Under the provisions of part B of Medicare, 1 the right of a senior citizen who has been denied benefits for medical services to obtain administrative and subsequent judicial review of that decision turns upon whether the determination which results in the denial of benefits relates to the claimant’s entitlement to those benefits (in which case there is a right of review), or merely to the amount of the benefits (in which case there is not). We have reviewed the Medicare statute and its legislative history as wéll as the nascent caselaw in the field.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Aquavella v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Sowell v. RichardsonDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1970
- Kuenstler v. Occidental Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1968
- Reading v. RichardsonDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Emma Bohlen v. Caspar Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Inez L. Rubin v. Caspar Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Monmouth Medical Center v. HarrisDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1980
- Hamilton v. Blue Cross of North DakotaDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1974
- Emma Bohlen v. Caspar Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973