Kuenstler v. Occidental Life Insurance Company
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, DECISION, AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL
HAUK, District Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Plaintiff filed an action in the Small Claims Court, Los Angeles Judicial District, County of Los Angeles, State of California, seeking recovery of $72.00 in medical expenses from the defendant.
2. Defendant is a private insurance company which has contracted with the federal government to administer the benefit provisions of Part B of Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, known as Health Insurance for the Aged (Medicare), Public Law 89-97, 79 Stat. 286.
3. Plaintiff’s claim arises…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Blackmar v. GuerreSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Reid v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Peterson v. WeinbergerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Ryan v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1992
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Virden v. Altria Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2004
- Mount Sinai Hospital of Greater Miami, Inc. v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1974
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.