Legal Opinion

Leetham v. McGinn

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1974No. 13368PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLISTER, Chief Justice:

Plaintiff is a licensed cosmetologist, Chapter 11, Title 58, U.C.A.1953. She has fulfilled the special requirements of Section 58-11-4, U.C.A.1953, and her license includes the right to cut hair. An investigator, employed by the Department of Registration of the State Department of Business Regulation, filed a formal complaint, charging plaintiff with cutting the hair of a male patron in violation of Section 58-11-12(2) (c), U.C.A.1953. Upon a formal hearing before defendant, Chairman of the Department, plaintiff’s license to practice cosmetology was revoked for a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MasonUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Maryland State Board of Barber Examiners v. KuhnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  3. Clayton v. BennettUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  4. State v. J. B. & R. E. Walker, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Justice v. Standard Gilsonite CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Ashish Patel, Anverali Satani, Nazira Momin, Minaz Chamadia, and Vijay Lakshmi Yogi v. Texas Department of Licensing and RegulationTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Malan v. LewisUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. J.J.N.P. Co. v. State Ex Rel. Division of Wildlife ResourcesUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. People v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  5. Vandolsen Ex Rel. Price v. Constructors, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API