Legal Opinion

Hardy v. Hohl

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1895No. 1608PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County.

1Opinion of the Court

*2The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, J.

This was an action upon a promissory note, and from the verdict and judgment thereon against him the defendant appeals. The defense was, that the note had been materially altered after its execution and delivery by the insertion of the word fifty in a space left in the printed form used for the insertion of an attorney’s fee. The insertion of this word made it appear as though an attorney’s fee of fifty dollars had been stipulated in case suit was brought to enforce collection of the note. The jury found for the plaintiff for the amount of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Yakima National Bank v. KnipeWashington Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pierson, Jr. v. FredericksonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  2. Dorman v. FisherNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  3. Harris v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API