Legal Opinion
Dorman v. Fisher
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided September 24, 1958PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
52 N.J. Super. 70 (1958)
144 A.2d 805
ISIDOR DORMAN AND NATHAN HILLMAN, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
MARGUERITE FISHER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 8, 1958.
Decided September 24, 1958.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, CONFORD and FREUND.
Mr. Robert Goodman argued the cause for defendant-appellant.
Mr. Martin Verp argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents.
The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, J.A.D.
The Law Division entered summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs in an action to recover possession of certain real property sold by the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- J. W. Pierson Co. v. FreemanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- A. Kaplen & Son, Ltd. v. Housing Authority of PassaicNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Ronkosky v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Coryell v. HardySupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
- Korb v. Spray Beach Hotel Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bishop v. BeecherNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
- Comerata v. Chaumont, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Welsh v. Griffith-Prideaux, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Sutton v. JonesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962