Legal Opinion

Bare v. American forwarding Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1909PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appear from the Branch Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on writ of error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Oscar M. Torrison, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn

A judgment recovered by the plaintiff in the municipal court of Chicago for the loss in transit of a trunk and its contents was affirmed by the Appellate Court, and the defendant has appealed, having obtained a certificate of importance.

The cause was tried by the court without a jury. Certain propositions were submitted to be held as law in the case. No question was made on the pleadings and no exception was taken to any ruling of the court on the trial except on these propositions.

It is insisted that the court erred in refusing the seventh proposition presented by the appellant and in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. SpragueIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Cheney v. CrossIllinois Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hinchliffe v. Wenig Teaming Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Illinois Highway Transportation Co. v. HantelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1944
  3. Beatrice Creamery Co. v. FisherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
  4. People ex rel. Croft v. KarrIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Heath v. Judson Freight Forwarding Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API