Heath v. Judson Freight Forwarding Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Buss Avery, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.
Defendant, a New York corporation, is engaged in the business of shipping and forwarding freight of all kinds, especially household furniture, from New York city to all points in the United States. For this purpose, defendant, at its loading station in Newark, New Jersey, assembles goods of various ownership that are to be shipped to a common destination. This is done for the purpose of making up a carload, that thereby a through rate may be obtained that is less than the published rates of the railroad company for broken lots. The accumulated carload, so assembled for any given destination,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lewis v. Galena & Chicago Union RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
- Bare v. American forwarding Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1909
- Kettenhofen v. Globe Transfer & Storage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- Bare v. American Forwarding Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1909
- Wente v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. Acme Fast Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Merchant Shippers Ass'n v. Kellogg Express & Draying Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
- Belland v. American Automobile Ins. Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
- Wald-Green Food Corp. v. Acme Fast Freight, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1951