Legal Opinion
Coriale v. Xerox Corp.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided April 6, 2011No. 09-CV-6492LPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge.
This action was commenced by eleven individual plaintiffs, who assert claims pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. The amended complaint, filed in November 2009, names six defendants: Xerox Corporation (“Xerox”); three retiree health care plans (collectively “plans”), including the Xerox Medical Care Plan for Retired Employees (“Old Plan”), Xerox Retiree Health Care Plan (“New Plan”), and the Xerox Retiree Flex Health Care Plan (“Flex Plan”); and two individuals, Lawrence Becker and…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Summers v. Earth Island InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Coriale v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Spring v. County of MonroeDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2014
- Vollmer v. Xerox CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2022