Legal Opinion

Meinhardt v. Luaders

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 24, 1978No. 38319PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Easement case. This litigation involves plaintiffs Meinhardts’ and Fisks’ right to travel over a 30 foot section of a private driveway extending over defendants’ land in order to reach a public roadway. The trial court heard the evidence and denied plaintiffs’ request to enjoin defendants’ interference with such use and sustained defendants’ counterclaim for quiet title. The court’s judgment specifically found that “no easement by prescription or implication exists on behalf of these plaintiffs in said driveway.” We affirm.

The property in question was owned as an entirety by the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dalton v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. Fassold v. SchamburgSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  3. McIlroy v. HamiltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. McDougall v. CastelliMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. George v. DickinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Homan v. HutchisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Harmon v. HamiltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Tamko Asphalt Products, Inc. v. Arch AssociatesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Kammerer v. CellaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Patrick T. Woodling v. Gregory Polk and Adrienne PolkMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API