Legal Opinion
Kammerer v. Cella
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided July 31, 1979No. 39994PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SNYDER, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiffs brought suit in ejectment and for damages under Count I and for additional damages under Count II of their petition. Defendant filed a counterclaim for an easement by prescription. Plaintiffs’ Count II was dismissed during the trial. After jury verdicts for defendant on both the petition and his counterclaim, the trial court granted plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial. This appeal followed.1
The judgment is affirmed.
Defendant contends the trial court erred in granting a new trial. The trial court’s stated grounds for the new trial were: (1) the jury verdicts…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Moore v. Ready Mixed Concrete CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Pitzman v. BoyceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
- Bridle Trail Association v. O'SHANICKMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
- Clark v. Quality Dairy CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- Lifritz v. Sears, Roebuck and CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McDowell v. Kawasaki Motors Corp. USAMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Follman Properties Co. v. Henty Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Niccoli v. ThompsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Oberle v. MoniaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Contemporary Management, Inc. v. 1007 Olive PartnershipMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988