Legal Opinion
McLelland v. Moore
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided September 4, 2001PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
779 A.2d 463 (2001)
343 N.J. Super. 589
Washington McLELLAND, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Respondent,
v.
Robert A. MOORE, Peter Yuro, Larry Pollex, Joseph Vas, and the Perth Amboy Police Department, Defendants-Respondents/Cross-Appellants.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 17, 2001.
Decided September 4, 2001.
Eldridge Hawkins, East Orange, argued the cause for appellant/cross-respondent (Herbert J. Tan, on the brief).
Fredrick L. Rubenstein, Perth Amboy, argued the cause for respondents/cross-appellants (Nolan & Hynes, attorneys; Mr. Rubenstein, on the brief).
Before Judges…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Young v. Schering Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Mehlman v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Weston v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
- Catalane v. Gilian InstrumentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Young v. Schering Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dzwonar v. McDevittSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- Klein v. UMDNJNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- Maw v. Adv. Clinical CommunicationsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- Gerard v. CAMDEN COUNTY HEALTH SERV. CENTERNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- Hitesman v. Bridgeway Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.