Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Pagan

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 3, 1983No. 2784PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, Juan Pagan, was convicted by the Honorable Clement J. McGovern, Jr., of possession of a controlled substance, 35 P.S. § 780-113(a)(16), and possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, 35 P.S. § 780-113(a)(30). Following the denial of post-verdict motions, appellant was sentenced to pay a $500 fine for the former offense and to undergo imprisonment for two to twenty-three months for the latter. In this appeal, appellant raises several claims, all of which were considered and rejected below. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of sentence for possession of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. BarnhartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. StasiakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. BowermasterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. BagleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. AriondoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. SmagalaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Commonwealth v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API