Legal Opinion

Holman v. Holman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 16, 1926No. 3193. [fn*]PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILDS ON, O. J.

(after stating the facts as above).

The court admitted as evidence, over appellant’s objection thereto, a marriage license issued in Harrison county, February 12, 1910, to Willie Thompson and Lula Whittaker, and a certified copy of a judgment of the district court of Panola county, rendered March 24, 1911, divorcing Wiley Thompson and Lula Thompson. The ground of the objection to the marriage license as that it did not “prove that a divorce had been granted between Wiley Thompson and Teter Thompson,” the appellee here. The ground of the objection to the judgment was that “it did…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Stewart v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Nixon v. Wichita Land and Cattle Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Edelstein v. J.M. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Wells v. HobbsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Holman v. HolmanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  2. Hill v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  3. Adams v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Holman v. HolmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Kettler v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API