Legal Opinion

Nixon v. Wichita Land and Cattle Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1892No. 7262PublishedCited by 47 opinions

Ho statement is necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

GAIHES, Associate Justice.

— This suit was brought originally by Mary C. Latham, joined by her husband and Eliza B. Weatherford, to recover of the appellee, a corporation known as the Wichita Land and Cattle Company, 320 acres of land, patented by virtue of a bounty warrant issued to L. D. Hixon. Subsequently the plaintiffs filed an amended petition, in which appellant joined them as a party plaintiff.

The defendant pleaded not guilty and the statutes of limitation. It also vouched in J. P. Hart as its warrantor, and prayed judgment over against him in the event of a recovery by plaintiffs.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Yates v. HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1848
  2. Lockhart v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Ames v. HubbyTexas Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. ElderTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Estate of Claveria v. ClaveriaTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Chancey v. WhinnerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Coleman v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Ingersol v. McWillieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API