Legal Opinion

Holman v. Holman

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided December 1, 1926No. 874-4625PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarvey, P. J.

In this suit Teter Holman, the plaintiff in error, claims to have contracted a valid common-law marriage with Boyd Holman, and to have been his lawful wife, under the common-law marriage, when the latter died in 1924. The validity of such alleged common-law marriage was assailed in the trial court by Turner Holman, the defendant in error, on the ground that Teter had a husband, to wit, Wiley Thompson, when said common-law marriage was undertaken by her and Boyd Holman.

The case was tried with the aid of a jury. The jury rendered a verdict upon special issues, in which they found that Wiley had…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Yates v. HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1848
  2. Nixon v. Wichita Land and Cattle Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Marshburn v. StewartTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  4. Holman v. HolmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Marshburn v. StewartTexas Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. ElderTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Hudspeth v. HudspethCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  3. In Re Pilcher's Estate. Von Pilcher v. PilcherUtah Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Casualty Underwriters v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Shaw v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API