Legal Opinion
Stack v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 25, 1928No. 5433PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs in error, hereinafter named the defendants, were convicted of violation of section 37 of the Penal Code (18 USCA § 88) in entering into a conspiracy to possess and sell intoxicating liquor and to maintain a common nuisance in violation of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA).
It is assigned as error that the trial court refused to instruct the jury that they should not consider the testimony concerning the possession and sales of liquor, for the reason that the evidence did not connect the defendants with any unlawful agreement, combination,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Allen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1924
- Davidson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924
- Calcutt v. GerigCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
- Keith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Marino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
- Poliafico v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- United States v. PotashCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Safarik v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.