Legal Opinion
Keith v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 12, 1926No. 4446PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDonahue, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The defendants, by demurrer, challenged the sufficiency of the indictment, and the overruling of that demurrer is assigned as error. Section 3 of title 2 of the National Prohibition Act provides in express terms that “no person shall * * * possess any intoxicating liquor except as authorized in this act.” Section 33 of the same title (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 10138%t), provides that “it shall not be unlawful to possess liquors in one’s private dwelling while the same is occupied and used by him as his dwelling only * * * provided such liquors are for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Steele v. United States No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Steele v. United States No. 2Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Remus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
- Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925
- Gehl v. Hebe Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Welch v. HudspethCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- Scaffidi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1930
- Ramsey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
- Stack v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- United States v. AlfanoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.