Legal Opinion

United States v. Potash

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 10, 1941No. 137PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWAN, Circuit Judge.

The appellants were tried and convicted under an indictment charging them and others, who were acquitted, with conspiracy to obstruct justice and corruptly to endeavor to influence and intimidate witnesses in a criminal anti-trust case then pending in the district court for the southern district of New York, contrary to the statute, the text of which is printed in the margin. Originally there were six appellants, but the appeal of Karpouzas has been discontinued. Of the remaining five, three were defendants in the anti-trust prosecution, and of these Potash and Winogradsky…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Di Carlo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  5. Clune v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Himmelfarb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  2. United States v. JamesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  3. United States Ex Rel. Joseph Russo v. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Passaic CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  4. United States v. ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  5. Affronti v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API