Commonwealth v. McLaughlin

Hargest, P. J.,

This case comes before us upon a motion to quash an indictment for two reasons: (1) That the indictment is bad for duplicity; and (2) that there is a variance between the information and the indictment.

The information charges that the defendant, “an assistant secretary and an assistant treasurer, employee and agent of the Commonwealth Trust Company, . . . did unlawfully and fraudulently embezzle, abstract and wilfully misapply certain moneys, funds and credits of the Commonwealth Trust Company.” The indictment, describing the defendant in the same way, charges that he “did…