Commonwealth v. Campbell
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 10, April T., 1903, by defendant, from judgment of Q. S. Mercer Co., Jan. T., 1902, No. 16, on verdict of guilty in case of Commonwealth v. C. C. Campbell, alias Charles Cunningham Campbell. Indictment 'for illegally practicing medicine. Before Miller, P. J.. Verdict of guilty.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 10, April T., 1903, by defendant, from judgment of Q. S. Mercer Co., Jan. T., 1902, No. 16, on verdict of guilty in case of Commonwealth v. C. C. Campbell, alias Charles Cunningham Campbell. Indictment 'for illegally practicing medicine. Before Miller, P. J.. Verdict of guilty. On motion for arrest of judgment Miller, P. J., filed the following opinion: • The defendant is indicted on two counts, the first count, practicing medicine and surgery without having exhibited a license to the prothonotary of Mercer county, the second count, keeping an office open for the practice of…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Smith, J.,
The Act of May 18, 1893, P. L. 94, regulating the practice of medicine and surgery, requires the registration of the practictioner in the prothonotary’s office, in the county in which he wishes to practice, fixes the conditions that entitles him to registration, and forbids him to “ enter upon the practice of medicine or surgery within the state, unless he or she has complied with the provisions of this act.” • In the case before us, the defendant has been tried and sentenced for practicing without having complied with these provisions in the matter of registration.
The…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MustoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Commonwealth v. WilkinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. GriffinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Commonwealth v. StrantzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Commonwealth v. DeppenDauphin County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1944
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.