Legal Opinion

Hutchins v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 27, 1890PublishedCited by 44 opinions

Plaintiff, as administrator of William Ferguson, brought this action in the district court for Hennepin county, to recover damages for alleged negligence of defendant resulting in the death of his intestate. At the trial before Smith, J., the plaintiff had a verdict of $3,500. The defendant appeals from an order refusiug a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This was an action under the statute to recover damages for the death of plaintiff’s intestate, caused by the alleged negligence of the defendant. Gen. St. 1878, c. 77, § 2. Plaintiff’s letters of administration were issued by the probate court of Hennepin county, in which the deceased received the injuries of which he there died. The gist of defendant’s first and second assignments of error is that the probate court had no jurisdiction to direct administration, because the deceased was not an inhabitant of this state, and left no assets therein. See Gen. St. 1878, c. 49, § 2. Without now…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. BayfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Rose v. Des Moines Valley R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1874
  3. Bolinger v. St. Paul & Duluth Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  4. Hartford & New Haven Railroad v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1869
  5. Balch v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Duval v. HuntSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
  2. Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. In Re Estate of MayoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  4. Forrester v. Southern Pacific Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Richards v. Riverside Iron WorksWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API