Legal Opinion
Klayman v. Lim
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 5, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2018-2209Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LARRY KLAYMAN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 18-2209 (RDM) ESTHER LIM, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Larry Klayman, proceeding pro se, brings this action against the District of Columbia Bar and its president, Esther Lim; the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”), which serves as the chief prosecutor for attorney disciplinary matters; and four of its members: Hamilton Fox, Elizabeth Herman, H. Clay Smith, III, and Julia Porter. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants have violated the common law and the U.S. Constitution…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sprint Commc'ns, Inc. v. JacobsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.