Legal Opinion
Sprint Commc'ns, Inc. v. Jacobs
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 10, 2013No. 12–815PublishedCited by 1,509 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ginsburg
This case involves two proceedings, one pending in state court, the other in federal court. Each seeks review of an Iowa Utilities Board (IUB or Board) order. And each presents the question whether Windstream Iowa Communications, Inc. (Windstream), a local telecommunications carrier, may impose on Sprint Communications, Inc. (Sprint), intrastate access charges for telephone calls transported via the Internet. Federal-court jurisdiction over controversies of this kind was confirmed in Verizon Md. Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of Md., 535 U.S. 635, 122 S.Ct. 1753, 152 L.Ed.2d 871 (2002). Invoking…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,509 opinions
- Amy Weber v. Frances McGroganCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- State of Texas v. USACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- BP p.l.c. v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Surender Malhan v. Secretary United States DepartCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Alaska Airlines v. Judy SchurkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
1,504 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.